Universality of Protection

States parties to major human rights instruments related to economic, social and cultural rights such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) have an immediate minimum core obligation to ensure the satisfaction of, at the very least, minimum essential levels of all economic, social and cultural rights such as the right to social security and the right to health for all members of society. These minimum essential levels are those which are crucial to securing an adequate standard of living through basic subsistence, essential primary health care, basic shelter and housing, and basic forms of education for all members of society. The ILO Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102) provides detailed guidance for the definition of the content of the right to social security under the ICESCR and regional instruments in various parts of the world. The basic social security guarantees constituting national social protection floors, according to the ILO Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202) can be considered as reflecting the minimum core content of the right to social security.

Even during times of severe resource constraints, when available resources are demonstrably inadequate, the obligation remains for States parties to demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at its disposal in an effort to satisfy, as matter of priority, minimum essential levels and to protect the most disadvantaged and marginalized members or groups of society by adopting relatively low-cost, targeted programmes.

According to the Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, the ICESCR requires States parties:

(a) To ensure access to a social security scheme that provides a minimum essential level of benefits to all individuals and families that will enable them to acquire at least essential health care, basic shelter and housing, water and sanitation, foodstuffs, and the most basic forms of education. If a State party cannot provide this minimum level for all risks and contingencies within its maximum available resources, the Committee recommends that the State party, after a wide process of consultation, select a core group of social risks and contingencies;

(b) To ensure the right of access to social security systems or schemes on a non-discriminatory basis, especially for disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and groups;

(c) To respect existing social security schemes and protect them from unreasonable interference;

(d) To adopt and implement a national social security strategy and plan of action;

(e) To take targeted steps to implement social security schemes, particularly those that protect disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and groups;

(f) To monitor the extent of the realization of the right to social security (CESCR General Comment 19 para 59).

The Committee has noted that “in order for a State party to be able to attribute its failure to meet at least its minimum core obligations to a lack of available resources, it must demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at its disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, these minimum obligations” (General Comment 19 para 60).

Progressive realization of the right to social protection

The concept of “progressive realization” describes a central aspect of States’ obligations to recognize and protect economic, social and cultural rights under international treaties. This principle is recognized both by the ICESCR and by ILO social security instruments. In terms of the right to social security, it means that States parties have an obligation to take appropriate measures to the maximum of their available resources towards the full realization of the right to social security. The ILO Social Protection Floors Recommendation reiterates the commitment to universal protection, but recognizes that this objective may be reached progressively, giving priority to the implementation of social protection floors as a starting point for those countries that do not have a minimum level of social security guarantees (para 13, 1a). ILO’s Convention No. 102 also sets out the principle of progressive realization in allowing States to initially accept obligations under three of the nine branches of social security, while providing that Members should subsequently accept other branches and move gradually towards the full achievement of the Convention (Article 3).

Referring to their available resource is therefore an acknowledgement of the fact that realization of these rights can be hampered by a lack of resources. Equally, it means that a State’s compliance with its obligation to take appropriate measures is assessed with the consideration of resources—financial and others—available to it.

Although minimum essential levels of social protection such as those provided through national social protection floors should be financed by national resources to the extent possible (Recommendation No. 202, para. 12), “available” resources are not only the resources within a State, but also those available from the international community through international assistance. States that do not possess the necessary resources are obliged to seek assistance to ensure, at the very least, minimum essential levels of enjoyment of social protection. Measures taken should be as expeditious and effective as possible.

Resource constraints prompt many States to target the provision of social security benefits on specific groups of the population, generally the poorest. From a rights-based perspective, targeting should only be an instrument toward the progressive realization of universal coverage. When targeting becomes unavoidable because of resource constraints, the targeting mechanism should abide by the principles of equality and non-discrimination. This means, for example, that the eligibility criteria should be objective, reasonable and transparent, and that stigmatization of beneficiaries should be avoided.

According to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Committee), there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to the right to social security are prohibited under the ICESCR. The Committee noted that, when adopting retrogressive measures, states must demonstrate that they have been introduced after the most careful consideration of all alternatives and that they are duly justified by reference to the totality of the rights provided for in the Covenant, in the context of the full use of the maximum available resources. If a State uses “resource constraints” as an explanation for any retrogressive measure, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights will assess the situation considering, inter alia, the country’s level of development, the severity of the breach, whether the situation concerned the enjoyment of the essential levels of human rights and whether or not the state had identified low-cost options or sought international assistance. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights writes that the ICESCR “implies a prohibition of measures that would diminish realization of the rights guaranteed by the Covenant, except when justified by certain strict criteria.” Retrogressive measures are those that would lead to a reversal in the enjoyment of rights recognized in the ICESCR. States are responsible for ensuring that their policy does not reduce access to social security.

Photo credit: “Homeworkers and their families, Malang, East Java, Indonesia” by ILO in Asia and the Pacific (CCBY 2.0 via Flickr).

 

Expert Commentaries

“Without my pension I would be dead for a long time”: social protection for older persons affected by HIV/AIDS

In the past 15 years, evidence has emerged on the role of social protection in mitigating older people’s vulnerability to the HIV/AIDS pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa. In particular, evidence on older people as carers of orphaned grandchildren revealed their extraordinary commitment for their families, as well as their severe vulnerability, and highlighted the lack of […]

Legal Instruments

Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102)

A reference for the development of social security systems, Convention No. 102 is the flagship of the up-to-date social security Conventions since it is deemed to embody the internationally accepted definition of the very principle of social security.  Convention No. 102 is unique for both its conceptual formulation of social security, and the guidance it provides for […]

Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202)

Recommendation No. 202 is the first international instrument to offer guidance to countries to close social security gaps and progressively achieve universal protection through the establishment and maintenance of comprehensive social security systems. To this aim, the Recommendation calls for (1) the implementation, as a priority, of social protection floors (SPF) as a fundamental element […]

Resources

Universal Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health: Realizing Health and Human Rights

How can people’s sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHRs) around the world be better protected and promoted? Watch panellists at this event present perspectives on: Challenges and good practices in ensuring full access to SRHRs Environmental dimensions of family planning The linkages between a human rights-based social protection framework and access to these rights Current […]

Exclusion by Design: an assessment of the effectiveness of the proxy means test poverty targeting mechanism (ESS Working Paper No. 56)

This paper assesses the effectiveness of the proxy means test (PMT) targeting methodology. It brings together international evidence to show that it is both inaccurate and arbitrary. The mechanism suffers from high in-built design errors, additional errors introduced during implementation, and infrequent surveys, meaning that it cannot respond to the dynamic nature of household incomes. […]

WHO QualityRights Guidance and Training tools

As part of the QualityRights Initiative, WHO has developed a comprehensive package of training and guidance modules. The modules can be used to build capacity among mental health practitioners, people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, people using mental health services, families, care partners and other supporters, NGOs, DPOs and others on how to implement […]

Human Development Report 2016 — Human Development for Everyone

The 2016 Human Development Report focuses on how human development can be ensured for everyone — now and in the future. It starts with an account of the achievements, challenges and hopes for human progress, envisioning where humanity wants to go. Its vision draws from and builds on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that […]

Report on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights (A/HRC/34/57), submitted by the Independent Expert on Foreign Debt and Human Rights, Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky

The present report is submitted by the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt on the enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 25/16. The report focuses on labour rights in the context of economic reform and austerity measures. In the […]

Extending Social Security to the Informal Economy – Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Moldova

Every member of society has the right to social security. Ensuring adequate social security for all is one of the key goals of the ILO’s Decent Work agenda. Most European countries have already established comprehensive social security systems. The existing systems typically operate in the forms of contributory social insurance systems and non-contributory, tax-financed social […]

Social Contract and the Future of Work: Inequality, income security, labour relations and social dialogue

The world of work is undergoing major changes that will continue, and potentially intensify, in the future. To better understand and in order to respond effectively to these new challenges, the ILO has launched a Future of Work initiative and proposed four centenary conversations for debates in the years leading up to its centenary anniversary […]

Non-Standard Employment around the World: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects

The report analyses the incidence and trends of non-standard forms of employment globally and explores the reasons behind this phenomenon, including changes in the world of work brought about by globalization and social change.

Formalizing Domestic Work

Many countries around the world are at the onset of a care crisis: with the ageing of the population, and continually increasing rates of female labour participation, families are increasingly turning to domestic workers to care for their homes, children, and ageing parents. While an increasing share of domestic work is part of the formal […]

Panorama de la protección social: diseño, cobertura y financiamiento

El estudio pone especial énfasis en las coberturas a lo largo del ciclo vital de las personas, identificando el inventario de programas, la cobertura y el nivel de las prestaciones, en seguimiento al Convenio 102 de la OIT sobre norma mínima de seguridad social y también la Recomendación 202, sobre los pisos nacionales de protección […]